Health Freedom

Tell the FDA that COVID Vaccines should NOT be approved for young children!

by Leave a Comment

TELL THE FDA THAT COVID VACCINES SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED FOR YOUNG CHILDREN! (By February 10)

Link to share: https://www.westonaprice.org/tell-the-fda-that-covid-vaccines-should-not-be-approved-for-young-children/

Pfizer/BioNTech has asked the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to expand the use of their COVID-19 vaccine for young children.

Under the FDA guidelines, a product must meet the following criteria to obtain EAU:

  • There must be an emergency
  • A vaccine must be at least 30-50 percent effective
  • The known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the risks of the product
  • There can be no approved, alternative treatments available

At least three of these criteria have not been met. There is no emergency among young children, the data shows no level of effectiveness, and based on the side effects observed in older children, the risks far outweigh the benefits!

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will meet on February 15th to evaluate the emergency use authorization (EAU) application. That means we have 2 weeks to try and stop the approval.

If approved, the vaccine is likely to be mandated for school attendance in many states, so we need your help. Please tell the FDA that COVID vaccines for children under five years old is a bad idea!

Talking points, which explain more about the problems with the vaccines, are below the Take Action section. Be sure to personalize your comments for optimum success.

TAKE ACTION

1)      Submit your comments for consideration by the FDA by February 10th if possible. (The final deadline is February 14, but they won’t be provided to the advisory committee if sent after the 10th)

You can submit comments online at: https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2022-N-0082-0001

For more information visit: https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-february-15-2022-meeting-announcement

2)     Contact your U.S. Senators and Representative and encourage them to ask the FDA to deny approval for COVID-19 vaccines to children under five years of age. 

You can find who represents you at: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/map

You can share your comments to the FDA with your elected officials, and urge them to weigh in.

SAMPLE COMMENTS: 

I urge the FDA to deny emergency use authorization of COVID-19 vaccines for children under five years of age.

There is no reason approve experimental vaccines for children who have extremely low risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19.

Pfizer’s clinical trial in 2-to-5-year-olds showed that their vaccines do not work. This is in addition to the real-world evidence that, even when the clinical trials showed effectiveness in older age groups, the vaccines have failed to protect adults and youth. 

Data from the Department of Defense shows that 70 percent of hospitalizations for COVID-19 are in fully vaccinated and boostered people.[i]

The FDA should not approve a vaccine for children when there is no data on the vaccine’s efficacy to support authorization and the vaccines are known to cause harm.

If the Pfizer vaccine is approved for children under five years old, most parents will falsely assume that it has been shown to be effective and safe. This is not the case.

Be sure to explain why this issue is important to you. You may wish to use a couple of the talking points below, but don’t simply copy them – just use them as ideas to help structure your own message.

TALKING POINTS for comments:

1)      Share why this is personal to you. Do you or a family member have a history of vaccine reactions? Are you at risk for autoimmune conditions or other potential side effects of COVID-19 shots?

2)      There is no evidence of medical necessity for COVID-19 shots in children. A rapidly growing body of data indicates that the vaccines have serious side effects and do more harm than good in children. 

3)      No one knows in advance whom a vaccine will harm. Each of us may respond differently as we have different medical histories, genes, epigenetics, and microbiomes.

4)      Vaccines are medical procedures that carry risk of serious injury. The U.S. Supreme Court recognizes vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” and to cause injury and death in some recipients. The U.S. Government has paid out $4.4 billion to the victims of vaccine injury. Hundreds of thousands have reported an adverse reaction to vaccination to VAERS. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/

5)      COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. The only option for compensating people injured by COVID-19 shots is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation program (CICP). Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP. No legal or medial expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. In other words, the victims will be severely undercompensated while the pharmaceutical companies get rich.

6)      The claimed justification – that unvaccinated individuals pose a health risk to others – has been shown to be false. Vaccinated individuals can become infected and transmit COVID to others.

7)      COVID-19 vaccines carry the risk of injury and death for some so there must be informed consent and the right to refuse the vaccine without penalty. As of January 21st, there had already been 740,000 COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and 10,316 COVID-19 vaccine deaths in the U.S. reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. 

8)      Vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline have paid billions of dollars in criminal penalties and settlements for research fraud, faking drug safety studies, failing to report safety problems, bribery, kickbacks and false advertising.[ii],[iii] Pfizer paid $2.3 billion in 2009 alone to resolve criminal and civil allegations. [iv]

9)      According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, less than 2% of childrenknown to be infected by the coronavirus are hospitalized, and less than 0.03% of those who are infected die. The risks of vaccination outweigh the potential benefits.

[i] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccines-miscarriages-cancer-neurological-disorders-military/

[ii] www.corp-research.org/merck

[iii] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/jul/03/glaxosmithkline-fined-bribing-doctors-pharmaceuticals?CMP=share_btn_fb

[iv] https://abcnews.go.com/Business/pfizer-fined-23-billion-illegal-marketing-off-label/story?id=8477617

Demand that Fauci be held accountable

by Leave a Comment

ACTION ALERT

12-16-21

DEMAND FAUCI BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!

Demand Fauci Be Held Accountable!

As Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Dr. Anthony Fauci has spent decades wielding his corrupt influence over hospitals, universities, medical journals, and influential doctors and scientists. Fauci launched his career during the early AIDS epidemic by partnering with pharmaceutical companies to sabotage safe and effective off-patent therapeutic treatments for the disease.

More recently, he has used his power to flood the public with fearful propaganda about COVID-19. To reveal the truth about “America’s Doctor,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written a #1 bestselling book titled: The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.

We here at the Weston A, Price Foundation highly recommend you read this book, and share it with others, in order to understand Fauci’s disastrous 50-year history with public health in our country. 

It is imperative that Fauci be properly investigated. If we can expose Fauci’s lies, perhaps we can put an end to vaccine mandates, passports, and other draconian COVID measures.

Please help expose ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ today!

TAKE ACTION

Call or email your Federal Legislators and ask them to demand Fauci be investigated.

You can find who represents you at: https://www.congress.gov/contact-us

Here is a sample script (personalize it by adding your own sentences and changing the wording – personal letters are far more effective than form letters!)

“My name is ____ and I live in (town). I am calling to ask Representative (or Senator) ____ to call for an investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci. 

Fauci lied to Congress about funding “Gain-of-function” research in Wuhan, China and has colluded with the pharmaceutical industry solely in the interest of profits.

Fauci has also repeatedly lied to the American public about the virulence and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2.

His most recent fraud involves his push to vaccinate children, which has nothing to do with their health and everything to do with adding billions of dollars to the bank accounts of corrupt pharma companies. Recently he referred to children as “vehicles of spread” for COVID, even though scientists and physicians around the world have proven this is not true.

American people, and all people, deserve answers and justice.

I urge _______ to call for an investigation of Fauci.”

Talking Points:

Keep your call or email short! Pick the 2 or 3 of these talking points – or none of them — that are most important to you, and be sure to explain why this issue matters to you personally.

1)      New documents released via FOIA litigation confirms what Senator Rand Paul has been asserting for months. Dr. Anthony Fauci lied to Congress about funding “Gain-of Function” research in Wuhan, China when he insisted that the U.S. “has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

2)      More than 900 pages of federal documents reveal details of U.S.-funded research on various coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, including two previously unpublished grant proposals that were funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is headed by Dr. Fauci.

3)      Documents show that NIAID provided more than $3.1 million for bat coronavirus research to the EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based nonprofit headed by Peter Dazak, including $599,000 to enable the Wuhan Institute of Virology to help identify and modify bat coronaviruses to infect humans.

4)      Fauci’s history in public health shows that he never should have been afforded so much power over the response to COVID. In the 1980s, Fauci orchestrated fraudulent studies, and then pressured U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators into approving a deadly chemotherapy treatment he had good reason to know was worthless against the disease AIDS. He also repeatedly violated federal laws to allow his pharmaceutical partners to use impoverished children as laboratory experiments in deadly experiments with toxic AIDS and cancer chemotherapies. 

Please help the Weston A. Price Foundation restore nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research and activism. westonaprice.org

Help End US Military Mandates

by Leave a Comment

ACTION ALERT

12-15-21

HELP END MILITARY VACCINE MANDATES!

Link to share: https://www.westonaprice.org/help-end-military-vaccine-mandates/

Members of Congress have introduced legislation to end the U.S. Armed Forces’ COVID vaccine mandates for service members.

H.R. 3860 would prohibit the Pentagon from mandating COVID vaccines by blocking the use of funds for any such mandate. It also prohibits “any adverse action” against service members who decline the vaccine.

The bill has been bottled up by House leadership, but a “discharge petition” has been filed to bypass the committee. If 218 Representatives sign the discharge petition, the bill would be brought to the floor of the House for a vote without needing the Committee or House leadership to agree! 

Currently, 88 Representatives have signed the petition, so we have a good start… but also a long way to go!

Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine, and Coast Guard service members all face deadlines this month to get the COVID shot. Only partial and conflicting numbers have been released, but we know that some service members are choosing to leave the armed forces rather than comply, and many others are being vaccinated against their wishes – and there is no reporting on the number who have suffered injuries as a result. Although thousands of service members have requested religious exemptions, it’s been reported that not a single exemption has been approved so far. Thousands of service members have held out, but don’t yet know the consequences of that action. 

And the Pentagon is in “active discussions” about mandating booster shots to all service members! There is little doubt these “boosters” will be a never-ending series of unnecessary injections, each carrying a risk of injury.

Please urge your U.S. Representative to put an end to this mandate!

TAKE ACTION

Call or email your U.S. Representative and urge him or her to sign Discharge Petition No. 8 today! Also ask them to also SUPPORT H.R. 3860.

You can find who represents you at: https://www.congress.gov/contact-us

Here is a sample script (personalize it by adding your own sentences and changing the wording – personal letters are far more effective than form letters!)

“My name is ____ and I live in (town). I am calling to ask Representative ____ to sign Discharge Petition No. 8 so the House can vote on H.R. 3860.

H.R. 3860 would protect members of the military from being forced to get the COVID vaccine. 

Military personnel put their lives on the line for our country, and we should respect their decision as to whether the risks from the COVID shot outweigh the benefits. They should not have to abandon their religious beliefs or undergo a medical procedure that carries the risk of severe injury, in order to continue serving their country. 

COVID vaccines are causing numerous serious side effects. To date, there have been 680,000 adverse reactions and over 9,100 deaths reported in connection with COVID vaccines. These vaccines have reportedly caused more injury and death than all other vaccines combined.

And for what? The Director of the CDC has admitted the vaccines do not prevent transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

I urge _______ to respect our country’s service members and support H.R. 3860 by signing Discharge Petition 8.”

Talking Points:

Keep your call or email short! Pick the 2 or 3 of these talking points – or none of them — that are most important to you, and be sure to explain why this issue matters to you personally.

1)     Share why this is personal to you. Are you a service member with a sincere religious objection to COVID vaccination? Are you worried about the side effects of COVID injections? Are you simply against government mandates that affect your bodily autonomy?

2)     One of the most basic human rights is that of bodily autonomy, as recognized by the Nuremburg Code. Ethical medicine requires prior, completely voluntary and fully informed consent.

3)     Each of us may respond differently to a vaccine because we have different medical histories, genes, epigenetics, and microbiomes.

4)     COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. The only option for compensating people injured by COVID-19 vaccines is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation program (CICP). Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP. No legal or medial expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. In other words, the victims will be severely undercompensated while the pharmaceutical companies get rich.

5)     The Director of the CDC admits COVID-19 shots do not prevent transmission. For this reason alone, our military personnel should not be forced to submit to the injections. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/08/06/cdc_director_vaccines_no_longer_prevent_you_from_spreading_covid.html#

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/28/covid-vaccinated-likely-unjabbed-infect-cohabiters-study-suggests

6)     COVID-19 vaccines carry the risk of injury and death for some so there must be informed consent and the right to refuse the vaccine without penalty. As of December 12th, there had already been 681,962 COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and 9,136 COVID-19 vaccine deaths in the U.S. reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

MORE INFORMATION

Learn more about H.R. 3860 here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3860/text

See the Discharge Petition here: https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/20211101?CongressNum=117

News report on the mandate and religious exemptions: No religious exemption has been granted within the DoD for ‘mandate’ (lawenforcementtoday.com)

Please help the Weston A. Price Foundation restore nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research and activism. westonaprice.org

Food Freedom at Stake – Help Support Maine Right to Food (Nov. 2nd Referendum)

by Leave a Comment

Support the Maine Right to Food Constitutional Amendment

Spread the Word to Vote YES on Referendum

link to share: https://www.realmilk.com/real-vs-synthetic-food-in-maine/

National opposition is working to defeat the constitutional protection of freedom of food choice and food security in Maine. The vote next Tuesday (Nov. 2nd) is a bellwether of things to come on your freedom to produce and obtain the foods of your choice. The same forces will be working to restrict freedom of choice in your state; Maine’s fight is your fight. 

The Right to Food referendum is the result of over eight years of work by a grassroots coalition of farmers, fishermen, food security activists, local foods advocates, and a bi-partisan group of legislators organizing to protect food sovereignty.

ACTION TO TAKE

The Right to Food for Maine campaign is facing an uphill battle as money for advertising pours in from DC lobbying groups. 

1. Your contributions can help us through the purchase of radio and print ads. Please donate at righttofoodformaine.org/donate

2. Please spread the word to friends and family in Maine to “Vote YES on Question 3” this November 2nd.

    Like & Share the Right to Food for Maine Facebook page – https://www.facebook.com/righttofoodforme: 

    Follow Right to Food for ME on Instagram: @righttofoodforme

    Use these hashtags:  #RightToFood #RightToFoodForMaine

REFERENDUM

On Tuesday, Nov. 2nd, Maine is poised to become the first state to clearly secure the Right to Food in its State Constitution. Referendum Question 3 will ask voters: “Do you favor amending the Constitution of Maine to declare that all individuals have a natural inherent and unalienable right to grow, raise, harvest, produce and consume the food of their own choosing for their own nourishment, sustenance, bodily health and well-being?”

If voters support Question 3, the following language securing the right to food will be included in the Constitution of Maine’s Declaration of Rights:

“Right to food. All individuals have a natural, inherent and unalienable right to food, including the right to save and exchange seeds and the right to grow, raise, harvest, produce and consume the food of their own choosing for their own nourishment, sustenance, bodily health and well-being, as long as an individual does not commit trespassing, theft, poaching or other abuses of private property rights, public lands or natural resources in the harvesting, production or acquisition of food.”

BACKGROUND 

A well-funded opposition campaign coordinated by DC-based lobbying groups tied to groups invested in the synthetic meat industry and opposing all animal agriculture and hunting, was recently launched and is rapidly spreading misinformation about the impacts of the right to food referendum. For more details on how potential out-of-state interests have, in effect, turned the Maine Right to Food measure into a national referendum on freedom of food choice, go here.

The state of Maine has been one of the pioneering states in the U.S. working on policies to ensure its population has the adequate access to nutritious food through direct farmer-to-consumer transactions. In 2017, this work resulted in Maine becoming the first state in the country to enact a Food Sovereignty law, requiring the State to recognize local authority over direct farm-to-consumer food exchanges. 

On July 2, 2021, lawmakers enacted the “Resolution, Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of Maine To Establish a Right to Food,” with over 75% of legislators voting in support. Passage of this Resolution sent referendum Question 3 to Maine voters.

Delegate Danielle Walker of the West Virginia House of Delegates and participant in the National Right to Food Community of Practice said: “Food sovereignty is a need, want, and desire across the United States. West Virginia is thankful that Maine is introducing a constitutional amendment that will highlight the right to food as a human right between food producers and consumers.”

Thomas Reynolds, Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Harvest, a non-profit organization supporting 375 food banks, meal programs and high-needs schools throughout Washington, and participant in the National Right to Food Community of Practice offered the following: “This important choice for Maine voters is an opportunity to lead the way for the rest of our country to ensure equitable, resilient food systems where all can feed ourselves with dignity.”

Voting YES for Ballot Question 3 will not only ensure a future of resilient and community-based food and farming communities in Maine but will provide guidance on the way for other states to follow suit and build towards a country that respects every citizen’s right to produce, process, distribute and access nutritious food through dignified means and with care for the natural resources that sustain our bodily health.

The people of Maine face a critical choice and historic moment at the ballot box this November 2nd. 

Food-sovereignty advocate Heather Retberg from Quill’s End Farm explains:      

It’s been and continues to be an uphill road, but we really believe that a proactive measure with this kind of foresight is necessary and vital now. 

As more corporate control infringes on our ability to grow our own food, access our own water, and feed ourselves, we will need this bulwark in place, so individual people have their legal rights secured and able to be protected/defended under the law.

Your help is needed to get the word out about the importance of securing the right to food. All power is inherent in the People. Do we have the right to obtain the foods we wish or don’t we? It’s really that simple. Let’s put it in black and white. Let’s put it in writing.

Food is life. The time is now.

Please help the Weston A. Price Foundation restore nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research and activism. westonaprice.org

IF YOU WISH TO UNSUBSCRIBE, please email info@westonaprice.org

Good News about Mandates!

by Leave a Comment

ACTION ALERT

11-19-21

WE HAVE GOOD NEWS! 

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has suspended the implementation and enforcement of the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for private businesses! 

Previously, under an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS), employers with 100 employees or more were given until Jan 4th to require their employees to either be vaccinated for COVID or be tested weekly and wear masks.  Businesses that didn’t comply could have faced federal fines of up to $14,000 per violation.

However, a Nov. 12th ruling by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals barred OSHA from enforcing the ETS “pending adequate judicial review” of a motion for permanent injunction.

The ruling comes after the New Orleans-based appeals court issued a stay on the order last Saturday.  That ruling came after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a challenge to the mandate directly to the court, along with the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Utah and South Carolina.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate “raises serious constitutional concerns,” was “fatally flawed” and “likely exceeds the federal government’s authority.”

Additionally, at least 27 U.S. states, as well as private employers, religious organizations, and other groups, have sued the Biden administration, claiming that it is exceeding its authority in issuing the mandate.

Despite the ruling, the White House is recklessly telling businesses to move forward with the mandates.  At this point in time, any business that does so is making a voluntary decision.  No law requires private businesses to mandate vaccines.

Unfortunately, OSHA’s latest action does not affect a separate directive from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services requiring certain employees of medical facilities to be vaccinated by Dec. 6th.  It also does not affect federal contractors.

To learn more about the OSHA suspension, read this article: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/osha-employer-vaccine-mandates-court-order/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=3f69115a-411a-4d58-a05d-97dcbeefea4c

To learn more about the Biden Administration’s irreverence for the ruling, click here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/after-osha-suspends-vaccine-rule-white-house-tells-businesses-to-move-forward-with-it_4112421.html?utm_source=CCPVirusNewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2021-11-19

If your employer or school attempts to require you to get a COVID shot, we recommend using the legal notifications provided by the Children’s Health Defense legal team. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/legal/legal-resources/

Help Fight the Federal “Hundred-Employee” Vaccine Mandate

by Leave a Comment

HELP FIGHT THE FEDERAL “HUNDRED-EMPLOYEE” VACCINE MANDATE 

Link to share: Help Fight The Federal “Hundred-Employee” Vaccine Mandate

Tell the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that it should not be coercing people into getting vaccinated!

OSHA has issued an interim final rule, effective November 5, which requires all U.S. companies with 100 or more employees to require their employees to either be vaccinated for COVID or be tested weekly and wear masks.  Businesses that don’t comply face federal fines of up to $14,000 per violation. 

This interim final rule is already in effect, but OSHA is requesting public comments as to whether it should become permanent.  The agency is also seeking comments on whether to expand the standard to cover smaller businesses as well!

The rule has been challenged in court and temporarily suspended while the court considers the merits of the case.  But we don’t know what the outcome of the case will be, and we need to speak up now!

Vaccines are a medical decision that should be left up to the individual, not mandated or coerced.  In addition to submitting your comments to OSHA, please urge your members of Congress to sign on to a bill to block OSHA fines on employers who don’t force their employees to get the COVID-19 shot!

TAKE ACTION

1)     Submit your written public comments to OSHA via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/11/05/2021-23643/covid-19-vaccination-and-testing-emergency-temporary-standard#open-comment

Deadline: December 6, 2021

Your comment can be very short.  State clearly that you oppose making the interim rule a final rule or expanding it in any way, and add a few sentences with your reasons.

2)     Contact your U.S. Senators and Representative and encourage them to sign on to H.R. 5464/ S. 2843.  

You can find who represents you at: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/map

Below is a sample script for U.S. Senators and Representatives.  Please use your own words. Calls are more effective than emails, and only take a few minutes.

“Hi, my name is ____ and I am a constituent. I am calling to ask Senator (or Representative) ______ to restore people’s right to choose whether to get the high-risk COVID vaccines in order to keep working, and also protect businesses from having to choose between mandating vaccinations or being fined. 

While the OSHA rule technically doesn’t mandate vaccinations, it clearly creates significant coercive pressure on employers and employees.  There have been thousands of breakthrough cases in fully vaccinated people, and a recent study showed that they are just as likely to infect those near them as people who are not vaccinated.  So requiring weekly testing and masking of unvaccinated individuals is not based on sound science, but rather is a blatant effort to impose so much expense, discomfort, and inconvenience on people that they will agree to be vaccinated even if they don’t want to, in order to keep their jobs. 

COVID vaccines are causing numerous serious side effects, and it is unethical to require anyone to get a vaccine that may injure or kill them in order to keep their job.  To date, over 634,000 adverse reactions and over 8,200 deaths have been reported in connection with the COVID vaccines.  These vaccines have reportedly caused more injury and death than all other vaccines combined.

Vaccines are a medical decision that should be left up to the individual, not mandated or coerced.  Vaccine mandates are contrary to the concept of informed consent for medical procedures. 

I urge _______ to support H.R. 5464/ S. 2843 to allow people to continue making a living without sacrificing their right to choose what medical procedures to undergo.”

Be sure to explain why this issue is important to you. You may wish to use a couple of the talking points below.  Don’t copy all of them – just use them as ideas to help structure your own message.

TALKING POINTS for calls and emails:

1)     Personal healthcare decisions should NOT be dictated by employment requirements. 

2)     Share why this is personal to you.  Are you an employee or an employer that would be adversely affected by the vaccine mandate?  Are you worried about the side effects of COVID injections?  Are you simply against government mandates that affect your bodily autonomy?

3)     One of the most basic human rights is that of bodily autonomy, as recognized by the Nuremburg Code.  Ethical medicine requires prior, completely voluntary and fully informed consent.

4)     Vaccine package inserts warn of the risk of brain damage, life-threatening allergy, and death and no one knows in advance whom a vaccine will harm.  Each of us may respond differently as we have different medical histories, genes, epigenetics, and microbiomes.

5)     COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. The only option for compensating people injured by COVID-19 vaccines is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation program (CICP).  Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP.  No legal or medial expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. In other words, the victims will be severely undercompensated while the pharmaceutical companies get rich.

6)     COVID-19 vaccines carry the risk of injury and death for some so there has to be informed consent and the right to refuse the vaccine without penalty.  As of November 5th, there had already been 634,609 COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and 8,284 COVID-19 vaccine deaths in the U.S. reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

MORE INFORMATION

Read the entire Federal Register document here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/11/05/2021-23643/covid-19-vaccination-and-testing-emergency-temporary-standard#open-comment?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=dbd335f7-c92b-421c-95d3-c5c23f650cc4

(The proposed rule is at the end of this lengthy document.)

If your employer or school requires you to get a COVID shot, we recommend using the legal notifications provided by the Children’s Health Defense legal team. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/legal/legal-resources/

Read the text, status and history of H.R. 5464 here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5464/committees?r=12&s=1

Please help the Weston A. Price Foundation restore nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research and activism. westonaprice.org

Walkout Peaceful Protest | November 4th

by Leave a Comment

November 3 – Call in Sick or Take a Personal Day

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) on Nov. 3 will join organizations and individuals in the kick-off of “Worldwide Walkouts” by calling in sick or taking a personal day to protest the unprecedented loss of freedom that has occurred the world over since the COVID pandemic began.

Worldwide Walkouts!

November 8-11

Advocates for Citizens’ Rights, orna Califia non-profit founded by attorney Leigh Dundas, along with Robert Kennedy Jr.’s organization Children’s Health Defense have joined other high-profile groups and individuals to promote a Nationwide Walkout & Stand for Freedom to take place November 8-11. The purpose of the voluntary work strike is to protest vaccine mandates in the workplace. This event carries the social media hashtag of #AxeTheVax.

The movement was started by regular every-day American workers reaching out to Dundas and others looking for a way to join together collectively in order to have their actions felt, and their voices heard. “This nationwide walkout has spread like wildfire, with white collar professionals joining the supply chain workers and truckers — and employees from every industry and all faiths, creeds, races and political affiliations — now pledging they will strike during the week of November 8, as a statement that jobs should never be conditioned on medical mandates and tyranny,” Dundas said.

Up until now, there have been intermittent protests across the country regarding vaccine mandates and there have been well-publicized business interruptions that may have been linked to worker “call-ins” but not reported as such. Recent flight cancellations at both Southwest and American airlines may have been contributed to by such employee uprisings. 

Dundas emphasizes the grassroots effort that started this effort, but also points to how it has been noticed by influencers across the board. “When influencers heard about this grass-roots movement, they decided it should be given a microphone, although it’s important to note that none of these individuals or groups condone illegal strikes or walkouts that are in contravention of applicable law or contract.” 

Some names recognizable to members of the current movement in the U.S. protesting authoritarian government action are Clay Clark & General Flynn, co-hosts of the Re-Awaken America Tour, and Dr. Simone Gold of America’s Frontline Doctors, along with Ann Vandersteel and Doug Billings, to name just a few.

The work boycott is being especially encouraged in the industries of goods manufacturing and supply chain, aerospace and telecom, healthcare and transportation, and government sectors. While those are specifically mentioned targets, everyone is encouraged to participate if they support the objective of standing against mandatory vaccinations (assuming they are not prohibited from striking by contract or law).

Dundas says that this is a response to what many attorneys, judges, and others believe are the unconstitutional actions of the Biden administration in imposing vaccine mandates. She makes it clear she is not standing alone. “Couple weeks ago, I started getting calls from the blue-collar guys.  You know, the folks who actually run this country.  Because Americans don’t often have cause to reflect on this simple truth, but the fact is that this country does not run on the back of people like you and me.  It runs on the backs of blue-collar workers who make products, and who move products.”

Dundas continued, “The blue-collar folks I talked to were working at large companies that were 40%, 50%, and often as high as 75% unvaccinated — and willing to hold the line. These guys are drawing a line in the sand, making a stand for freedom.  And I believe in my core that the week of November 8 will go down in the history books as the day that freedom rose up, tyrannical mandates went on the run, and history was changed for the better.”

More information regarding the Nationwide Walkout & Stand for Freedom can be found by texting the word “Freedom” to 53445, or by visiting www.Citizens-Rights.org, or by following on Twitter at #AxetheVax.

Urgent #2: Tell CDC Covid vaccines for children should not be recommended

by Leave a Comment

ACTION ALERT

10-29-21

LET THE CDC KNOW COVID VACCINES FOR CHILDREN SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED

Link to share: https://www.westonaprice.org/let-the-cdc-know-covid-vaccines-for-children-should-not-be-recommended/

The Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently failed our kids by approving the Pfizer vaccine for children between the ages of 5 and 11. 

Now that the FDA has expanded Pfizer’s emergency use authorization to those as young as 5, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will do a separate risk-benefit analysis to determine whether the vaccine should be recommended on November 2-3, 2021.

The CDC can choose NOT to recommend the shots for young children, or can recommend more narrow use than the FDA opened the door to.  The CDC is not bound by the FDA authorization, so let’s make our voices heard!

Public comments can be submitted through Wednesday, November 3rd, but comments made by Friday, October 29th will have more impact, as they will be sent to ACIP members before the meeting.

If recommended by the ACIP, the vaccine is likely to be mandated for school attendance in many states, so we need your help to tell the CDC now that COVID vaccines for young children are a bad idea!

Talking points, which explain more about the problems with the vaccines, are below the Take Action section.  Be sure to personalize your comments for optimum success.

TAKE ACTION

Submit your comments for consideration by the ACIP today if possible, and by November 3 at the latest.

You can submit comments online here: https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/CDC-2021-0112-0001

Or register to make oral comments at the virtual meeting here: https://www2.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/acip_publiccomment.asp

Be sure to explain why this issue is important to you. You may wish to use a couple of the talking points below, but don’t simply copy them – just use them as ideas to help structure your own message.

TALKING POINTS for comments:

1)      Share a personal story, if you have relevant experience.  Have you, a family member, or someone you know personally had an adverse reaction to a COVID vaccine?

2)      As of October 4th, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s data show 30,177 people who were hospitalized or died despite being fully vaccinated.  And since that only covers hospitalizations or deaths where the vaccine status was reported, even the agency acknowledges it is an undercount of COVID infections among fully vaccinated persons.

3)      COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. The only option for compensating people injured by COVID-19 vaccines is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation program (CICP).  Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP.  No legal or medial expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. In other words, the victims will be severely undercompensated while the pharmaceutical companies get rich.

4)      As of October 10th, there had already been 593,728 COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and 7,437 COVID-19 vaccine deaths in the U.S. reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

5)      It is estimated that only 1-10 percent of all vaccine reactions are ever reported to VAERS.

6)      According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, less than 2% of children known to be infected by the coronavirus are hospitalized, and less than 0.03% of those who are infected die. The risks of vaccination do not outweigh the potential benefits.

Urgent: Tell USDA lab-raised cells need be clearly labeled

by Leave a Comment

Take Action: Tell the USDA that lab-raised cells need to be clearly labeled

Link to share: https://www.westonaprice.org/take-action-tell-usda-that-lab-raised-cells-need-to-be-clearly-labeled/

The USDA has started the process to adopt rules governing how “meat and poultry products comprised of or containing cultured cells derived from animals” should be labeled. First, the agency is taking public comments on the topic generally. After considering the comments, USDA will publish a proposed rule and there will be a second opportunity for comments – but we are more likely to impact the agency’s thinking at this stage, rather than after they have written their proposal. 

What is this stuff? A company’s scientists take a sample of cells from an animal, screen them and store for future use. The cells are taken out of storage, provided with some sort of liquid nutrients and “other factors to support growth and cellular multiplication.” As they multiply, they continue to be fed the artificial liquid nutrients as well as more growth factors and provided surfaces to attach to, so that they create something that looks and feels like meat.

USDA has signaled that it is not likely to completely prevent these lab foods from being labeled “beef” or “meat,” but it is looking for some labeling terms to distinguish the lab products from “slaughtered meat products.”

TAKE ACTION

Submit your comment online at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/03/2021-19057/labeling-of-meat-or-poultry-products-comprised-of-or-containing-cultured-animal-cells#open-comment

Deadline: 11:59 pm Eastern, Tuesday, November 2

Below is a sample comment you can use if you are short on time and/or having trouble thinking what to write. If you can, though, take a moment to look at the questions that follow this sample – these are some of the key questions that USDA is seeking comments on, and you will have an even greater impact by addressing one or more of those in your own words.

SAMPLE COMMENT

In response to the agency’s questions (1), consumers should be clearly informed that a product was derived from cell cultures grown under artificial conditions rather than from live animals fed whole foods. Numerous scientific studies show that a live animals’ diet significantly changes the nutrient profile of its meat – given that, it is certain that raising isolated cells on synthetic nutrients and added chemicals “alters the biological, chemical, nutritional, or organoleptic properties of meat or poultry to the extent that the resulting product no longer aligns with consumers’ expectations.” These lab-raised foods are fundamentally different from what normal people consider “meat.”

(2) In describing these products, the agency should not use the word “cultured.” In the context of food, the word “cultured” has been used to describe fermented foods for many years. The process of fermenting foods, to preserve them and to make them more digestible and more nutritious, is as old as humanity. From the Tropics to the Arctic, fermented foods are valued for their health giving properties and for their complex tastes.

Fermenting food is both a science and an art, a small-scale artisanal process that increases the nutritional value of the agricultural product – an entirely different process and outcome than lab-based animal cell “meats.” Using the term “cultured meat” would mislead many consumers who may believe that this is analogous to “cultured dairy” products (yogurt, kefir, cultured sour cream), done using traditional methods and producing a more nutritious final product. 

Other terms would be clearer, such as “lab raised” or “cell cultivated.” 

As a consumer, I urge the agency to either prevent these foods from being labeled as “meat” at all or, at a minimum, to require clear terminology that provides consumers with unambiguous information as to the source of the product.

USDA QUESTIONS

Below are some of the key questions USDA is seeking comments on. We’ve kept the original numbering, so you can reference which one(s) you’re responding to. You can also read all the USDA’s notice with all the questions here, or simply write your own comment without reference to the specific questions.

1. Should the product name of a meat or poultry product comprised of or containing cultured animal cells differentiate the product from slaughtered meat or poultry by informing consumers the product was made using animal cell culture technology? If yes, what criteria should the agency consider or use to differentiate the products? If no, why not?

2. What term(s), if any, should be in the product name of a food comprised of or containing cultured animal cells to convey the nature or source of the food to consumers? (e.g., “cell cultured” or “cell cultivated.”)

a. How do these terms inform consumers of the nature or source of the product?

b. What are the benefits or costs to industry and consumers associated with these terms?

c. If meat or poultry products comprised of or containing cultured animal cells were to be labeled with the term “culture” or “cultured” in their product names or standards of identity (e.g., “cell culture[d]”), would labeling differentiation be necessary to distinguish these products from other types of foods where the term “culture” or “cultured” is used (such as “cultured celery powder”)?

4. What term(s), if used in the product name of a food comprised of or containing cultured animal cells, would be potentially false or misleading to consumers? For each term, please provide your reasoning.

6. Should names for slaughtered meat and poultry products established by common usage (e.g., Pork Loin), statute, or regulation be included in the names or standards of identity of such products derived from cultured animal cells?

a. If so, is additional qualifying language necessary? What qualifying terms or phrases would be appropriate?

b. Do these names, with or without qualifying language, clearly distinguish foods comprised of or containing cultured animal cells from slaughtered products?

9. What nutritional, organoleptic (e.g., appearance, odor, taste), biological, chemical, or other characteristics, material to consumers’ purchasing and consumption decisions, vary between slaughtered meat or poultry products and those comprised of or containing cultured animal cells?

12. Should FSIS-regulated broths, bases, and reaction flavors produced from cultured animal cells be required to declare the source material in the product name, ingredient sub-listing, or elsewhere on the label?

14. What label claims are likely to appear on FSIS-regulated products comprised of or containing cultured animal cells? Should FSIS develop new regulations or guidance on such claims to ensure they are neither false nor misleading?

MORE INFORMATION

You can read the USDA’s notice, which includes some of the history of the discussions around this issue as well as the full list of questions, at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/03/2021-19057/labeling-of-meat-or-poultry-products-comprised-of-or-containing-cultured-animal-cells

Update: “Hundred-Employee” Mandate Does Not Exist

by Leave a Comment

ACTION ALERT- UPDATE

10-26-21

BIDEN’S “HUNDRED-EMPLOYEE” VACCINE MANDATE DOES NOT EXIST YET

Biden’s “Hundred-Employee” Vaccine Mandate Does Not Exist Yet

Last month we sent you an alert regarding President Biden’s “mandate” that all U.S. companies with 100 employees or more require COVID vaccination or weekly testing, or face federal fines of up to $14,000 per violation. 

It’s turned out that there actually is not a mandate at this time.  Biden did not sign an executive order regarding his “hundred-employee” vaccine mandate.  Rather, he directed the Department of Labor and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to develop the details of a COVID vaccine mandate, which has not been done yet.

To date, there has simply been an announcement that there will be a mandate.  Thus any company that is ordering their employees to take the vaccines is doing so voluntarily.  

Note that Biden did sign two executive orders that require all federal employees and federal contractors to get the shots.  Challenges are being brought in court, and we are watching what happens.

Vaccines are a medical decision that should be left up to the individual, not mandated.  Urge your members of Congress to sign on to a bill to block OSHA fines on employers who don’t force their employees to get the COVID-19 shot!

TAKE ACTION

Contact your U.S. Senators and Representative and encourage them to sign on to H.R. 5464/ S. 2843.  

You can find who represents you at: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/map

Calls are more effective than emails, and only take a few minutes.

“Hi, my name is ____ and I am a constituent. I am calling to ask Senator (or Representative) ______ to restore people’s right to choose whether to get the high-risk COVID vaccines in order to keep working, and also protect businesses from having to choose between mandating vaccinations or being fined. 

We should not be forcing employers to fire their valuable workers, especially during times of worker shortages.

COVID vaccines are causing numerous serious side effects, and it is unethical to require anyone to get a vaccine that may injure or kill them in order to keep their job.  To date, over 593,000 adverse reactions and over 7,400 deaths have been reported in connection with the COVID vaccines.  These vaccines have reportedly caused more injury and death than all other vaccines combined.

Vaccines are a medical decision that should be left up to the individual, not mandated.  Vaccine mandates are contrary to the concept of informed consent for medical procedures. 

I urge _______ to support H.R.  5464/ S. 2843 to allow people to continue making a living without sacrificing their right to choose what medical procedures to undergo.”

Be sure to explain why this issue is important to you. You may wish to use a couple of the talking points below.  Don’t copy all of them – just use them as ideas to help structure your own message.

TALKING POINTS for calls and emails:

1)      Share why this is personal to you.  Are you an employee or an employer that would be adversely affected by President Biden’s vaccine mandates?  Are you worried about the side effects of COVID injections?  Are you simply against government mandates that affect your bodily autonomy?

2)      One of the most basic human rights is that of bodily autonomy, as recognized by the Nuremburg Code.  Ethical medicine requires prior, completely voluntary and fully informed consent.

3)      Vaccine package inserts warn of the risk of brain damage, life-threatening allergy, and death and no one knows in advance whom a vaccine will harm.  Each of us may respond differently as we have different medical histories, genes, epigenetics, and microbiomes.

4)      COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. The only option for compensating people injured by COVID-19 vaccines is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation program (CICP).  Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP.  No legal or medial expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. In other words, the victims will be severely undercompensated while the pharmaceutical companies get rich.

5)      COVID-19 vaccines carry the risk of injury and death for some so there has to be informed consent and the right to refuse the vaccine without penalty.  As of October 10th, there had already been 593,728 COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and 7,437 COVID-19 vaccine deaths in the U.S. reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

MORE INFORMATION

If your employer or school requires you to get a COVID shot, we recommend using the legal notifications provided by the Children’s Health Defense legal team. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/legal/legal-resources/

Read the text, status and history of H.R. 5464 here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5464/committees?r=12&s=1

Please help the Weston A. Price Foundation restore nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research and activism. westonaprice.org

IF YOU WISH TO UNSUBSCRIBE, please email info@westonaprice.org